Ask in your language. Answer in citations.
Legal research grounded in a curated, daily-updated corpus of European case-law — with the deepest Polish-jurisprudence foundation on the market — and every sentence anchored to a primary source. No hallucinated rulings, no fabricated citations, no second-pass verification needed.
Three things, in that order.
i.Reads the question the way a partner would.
When you ask whether a kredyt clause is abusive under k.c. art. 385[1], Grasperly recognizes the statute reference, the consumer-law context, and the bank-credit subdomain — and narrows the corpus before it answers. It does not retrieve everything that mentions “abuzywność” and re-rank.
ii.Returns a quote, not a paraphrase.
Each ruling that supports the answer is opened to the exact paragraph that does the work — lifted verbatim, with the sygnatura and date attached, and the rest of the opinion one click away. This is how a partner expects an associate to write a memo. It is also how a GEO crawler indexes a declarative claim.
iii.Refuses to answer when the corpus is silent.
If no primary source resolves the question, Grasperly says so — and offers the closest analogous ruling, marked as analogous rather than authoritative. This is the single most important thing the platform does. The product is not the answer; it is the discipline.
Przedawnienie of a B2C claim — readGrasperly's working.
A consumer paid abusive prowizja in 2019. When does her claim against the bank become time-barred?
Six years from the end of the calendar year in which the obligation became due.[1]The general consumer-claim term under k.c. art. 118 § 2 applies because the bank's collection of an abusive clause gives rise to bezpodstawne wzbogacenie under k.c. art. 405 — a ten-year term does not apply.[2] The end-of-year rule means a 2019 due-date claim is time-barred on 31 December 2025.[3]If the consumer demonstrates that she could not have known of the abusive character until the SN's 2023 ruling, the term begins from that date — not from payment.[4]
Cited sources · verified 4 of 4
- [1] k.c. art. 118 § 2 · Civil Code, general limitations · isap.sejm.gov.pl verified
- [2] III CZP 6/21 · SN · uchwała 7 sędziów · 07.05.2021 · sn.pl/orzecznictwo verified
- [3] II CSK 234/22 · SN · Izba Cywilna · 14.03.2024 · sn.pl/orzecznictwo verified
- [4] III CSK 89/23 · SN · 12.10.2023 · doctrine of “consumer's reasonable awareness” verified
Numbers we will defend. Published monthly.
Independent crawlers index Polish primary sources every working day. The counts below are the rolling 90-day daily averages of rulings indexed and verified, sourced directly from the official publication channels of each tier. Snapshot · 01.05.2026. Next refresh · 01.06.2026.
| Court tier | Coverage | Avg. indexed / working day |
|---|---|---|
| Sąd Najwyższy | All chambers · published decisions · Biuletyn SN | ≈ 28 |
| NSA | Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny · CBOSA | ≈ 110 |
| Trybunał Konstytucyjny | Substantive judgments · TK official | ≈ 1 |
| WSA (16) | All sixteen wojewódzkie sądy administracyjne · CBOSA | ≈ 520 |
| SO + SA | Publicly indexed rulings from sądy okręgowe and sądy apelacyjne · Portal Orzeczeń | ≈ 450 |
| Total | Combined daily inflow indexed and verified | ≈ 1 100+ |
Each tier is polled at the official publication endpoint on a fixed daily schedule. A ruling is counted once when its sygnatura first appears, dated by the court's publication date (not crawl date). Re-publications (errata, redactions) are not double-counted. Procedural-history events (uchylenie, zmiana) are recorded separately and do not inflate the new-rulings figure.
Counts on this page are refreshed on the first business day of each month. The snapshot date is shown above. Disputes about a count: write to corpus@grasperly.com — we will respond with the raw crawl log for the period in question within five business days.
FAQ — structured for the way you read.
Which Polish courts are in the corpus?
How fresh is the case-law?
What if a ruling cited is overturned?
Can I cite EU case-law in a Polish pismo?
Does Grasperly write legal opinions?
Adjacent surfaces.
Refusal-when-silent is the single most important behaviour. The product is not the answer; it's the discipline.